Seeking dietary advice from artificial intelligence (AI) proved costly for a 60-year-old man. According to a US medical journal, the man developed a rare condition after he consulted ChatGPT about removing table salt from his diet.
An article published in the Annals of Internal Medicine on August 5 warned against using ChatGPT for health information, citing this case. The man was diagnosed with bromism after he switched table salt for sodium bromide for three months.
Let’s take a closer look.
What is bromism?
Bromism, also known as bromide toxicity, is a syndrome that results from chronic overexposure to the chemical compound bromide or bromine.
The “toxidrome”, a syndrome caused by an accumulation of toxins, can trigger several neurological, psychiatric and digestive symptoms. It can lead to psychosis, agitation, mania and delusions, as well as issues with memory, thinking and muscle coordination, as per Live Science.
Bromide was widely used in prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs, including sedatives, in the 19th and 20th centuries. However, over time, it came to be known that chronic exposure to the chemical compound caused bromism.
In the 1970s and 1980s, US regulators removed several forms of bromide from OTC medicines, including sodium bromide. The cases of bromide toxicity dropped significantly after this. The condition remains quite rare today.
How man got bromism after ChatGPT advice
A man, worried about the health risks of sodium chloride, or table salt, consulted
ChatGPT about removing it from his diet. He then replaced table salt with sodium bromide, which was responsible for almost one in 10 psychiatric admissions in the early 20th century, as per The Guardian. He purchased sodium bromide online and consumed it for three months.
He made the switch even after reading that “chloride can be swapped with bromide, though likely for other purposes, such as cleaning”.
The authors wrote that the man went to a hospital and claimed that his neighbour might be poisoning him.
He initially did not admit to taking any medications, including supplements, but later said that he had several dietary restrictions. The man said he distilled his water at home, as per the paper.
Despite being thirsty, the bromism patient was observed as being paranoid about the water he was offered.
“In the first 24 hours of admission, he expressed increasing paranoia and auditory and visual hallucinations, which, after attempting to escape, resulted in an involuntary psychiatric hold for grave disability,” the authors wrote.
Once the patient became stable, he reported several other symptoms of bromism, including facial acne, excessive thirst and insomnia.
After three weeks, he was discharged from the hospital.
What did ChatGPT tell the man?
The article’s authors, from the University of Washington in Seattle, said the case showed “how the use of artificial intelligence can potentially contribute to the development of preventable adverse health outcomes”.
They said they could not get the patient’s ChatGPT conversation log, so it was not possible to know what advice the man received.
The authors also consulted ChatGPT, asking what chloride could be replaced with. The response also included bromide, without providing a specific health warning or asking the authors why they were seeking such information – “as we presume a medical professional would do”, they wrote.
The article warned that ChatGPT and other AI apps could “generate scientific inaccuracies, lack the ability to critically discuss results, and ultimately fuel the spread of misinformation”.
The US journal article said the patient seemed to have used an earlier version of ChatGPT.
OpenAI, the developer of ChatGPT, recently launched an updated
GPT-5-powered version of the chatbot. It claimed the bot will provide better health-related responses and be more proactive at “flagging potential concerns”, such as serious physical or mental illness.
However, the company emphasised that ChatGPT is not a substitute for professional help. Ita also underlined its own guidelines that state it is not “intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of any health condition.”
With inputs from agencies
You may also like
Archives
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- October 2023
- December 2021
Recent Posts
- Are strikes legal under Federal employment law Toronto?
- 웹사이트 검색누락 체류시간 중요할까요?
- 기대해도 괜찮은 곳이 강남달토야?
- Can probation employees claim unjust dismissal Canada?
- Does the Instagram API support comment moderation?
- The Results Don’t Lie: Decen Masters Scam or Legit?
- Is a Mobile locksmith efficient for multi-unit buildings?
- Can unjust dismissal apply to federally regulated nonprofits?
- 해외스포츠중계 문의 응답 빠른가요?
- 무료 스포츠중계 사이트는 스마트 TV에서도 볼 수 있나요?
- 레플리카 운동화 쿠션감은 어떤가요?
- Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) Principles: Structured Methods for Initial Data Inspection, Quality Checking, and Pattern Discovery
- What’s the typical process with a workplace harassment lawyer?
- Can I extend my booking for the best car rental with driver in Mumbai?
- How can automation support B2B network marketing?
- Copper Water: Ancient Health Hack Or Risky Trend? Learn The Truth | Lifestyle News
- Dubai International Cricket Stadium Pitch Report: Pakistan vs UAE Asia Cup 2025 Insights & Conditions
- Little-known beach an hour from major UK city is ‘hidden gem’ | UK | Travel
- What are the symptoms to look out for? – Firstpost
- When Rimac, Koenigsegg, And Singer Bosses Swap Cars, All Hell Breaks Loose

Leave a Reply